![tiktok download org tiktok download org](https://clipartcraft.com/images/tiktok-logo-app-2.png)
According to App Annie, a mobile data and analytics company, TikTok was the most downloaded app from iOS and Android app stores in 2020, ahead of Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube. TikTok said in August 2020 that it had about 100 million monthly and 50 million daily active U.S. They target the U.S./international and Chinese markets, respectively.Įach service has a broad user base in its target market. TikTok and Douyin are both short-form video sharing platforms that share most of the same key features. For this study, we looked at two ByteDance services: TikTok and its counterpart in China, Douyin. Outside China, it is mostly known for its video sharing service, TikTok. It has various video sharing, social media, news, and web search products that are popular in China. Why did we decide to study ByteDance?įounded in 2012, ByteDance is headquartered in Beijing and legally domiciled in the Cayman Islands. With that being said, we observed that TikTok leverages an aggressive combination of human and algorithmic content curation and moderation techniques that appear to prioritize content that is entertaining and apolitical, similar to Douyin. The two platforms’ policy environments reflect critical differences in the legal and regulatory frameworks where they operate. What does the policy contrast between TikTok (in the U.S.) and Douyin tell us about how Chinese companies operate both at home and in foreign jurisdictions? But we have to take TikTok’s word for it. (with a backup in Singapore) and is at no risk of acquisition by the Chinese government. platforms in its efforts to protect user data. Technical research by the Citizen Lab also suggests that the company takes technical precautions similar to those of U.S. TikTok’s policies offer the same kinds of protections for user data as its U.S. (such as Instagram and YouTube) when it comes to policies affecting users’ freedom of expression and privacy.Īre TikTok users subject to greater human rights risks, given that the platform’s parent company, ByteDance, is headquartered in China? While TikTok’s policies and practices stand out in a few small ways, the platform is largely aligned with its major competitors in the U.S.
![tiktok download org tiktok download org](https://imag.malavida.com/mvimgbig/download-fs/tiktok-downloader-28083-9.jpg)
policies substantively different from those of similar U.S.-based platforms? Key questions and answersĪre TikTok’s U.S.
#TIKTOK DOWNLOAD ORG FREE#
users compare with the policies of its dominant U.S.-based competitors, mainly Instagram and YouTube, particularly in light of geopolitical and free speech controversies that have emerged with the rise of TikTok in the U.S. Finally, we wanted to find out how TikTok’s policies for U.S.
![tiktok download org tiktok download org](https://gbplus.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/TikTok-Mod-APK-768x432.jpg)
Second, we wanted to compare TikTok’s and Douyin’s policies, to increase our understanding of how Chinese internet governance practices change or persist outside of Chinese territory. We set three core objectives: First, we wanted to see how ByteDance’s governance choices regarding content, data security, and government censorship and data demands affect users’ rights. We were naturally intrigued by ByteDance, which is the first Chinese social company to achieve mass popularity outside the east Asian market, and to compete with leading U.S. This spring, Ranking Digital Rights conducted a study on the privately owned, Beijing-based company ByteDance and its twin video-sharing services TikTok and China-based counterpart Douyin. As with the RDR Index, our aim with these studies is to establish an evidence base that policy makers, investors, and civil society can use to hold these companies accountable and against which we can monitor their progress over time. For these studies, we apply a selection of our rigorous human rights-based standards to evaluate their policies and practices, and the potential risks they pose to human rights and the global information ecosystem. Authors: Zak Rogoff, Veszna Wessenauer, Jie Zhangįrom time to time, Ranking Digital Rights assesses companies that are having a growing impact on the public interest and the protection of people’s rights, but are not covered in the RDR Corporate Accountability Index.